The Knightley News

Who says bigger is better? Certainly not Keira Knightley, who refused to allow her breasts to be photoshopped in publicity photos for her new film,"TheDuchess". Keira's just fine with her body as it is, and so am I. Not that she's ever asked me, but if she did, I know just what I'd say: "Ohhh, wow, uuhhhhhh, Keira, *pant pant*...wow".

Well the secret's out now; I'm more coherent with the written word than face to face, which is the real reason people go into writing to begin with. But this isn't about me, oh no, it's about Keira's kleavageand I always promised I'd keep you abreast of developments in the news. Or not.

When they digitally enhanced Knightley's knubbins, (once you start this kind of wordplay, it's kinda hard to stop),for "King Arthur" in 2004, Keira was just fine with it, but not now. She definitely nipped this one in the buds, and she adamantly refuses to undego any enhancement, digital or surgical. Can't blame her really, as in her profession, you're supposed to be famous for your looks, and she is already, so why mess with that?

If you're curious about what "King Arthur" did,(the film, not the royalty), here's some visual evidence of the points I'm trying to make:If you peer closely you can see they didn't do all that much enhancing, but it is noticeable. Just what exactly is Hollywood trying to sell here?

Same as usual of course. With the public so happy to buy, I can't get too upset at the movie folks, but still...a little truth wouldn't exactly hurt. After all, (those of you with weak stomachs may want to stop reading now), I think it would be great if Hollywood filmmakers made a clean breast of things.



Copyright ©  2008 thehumorsmithchronicle